The first episode of 2026 marks a clear inflection point for Bitcoin’s market structure. Major banks are moving from observation to distribution, advisors are beginning to recommend allocations rather than wait for client requests, and long standing cycle frameworks are starting to lose explanatory power.
At the same time, generational pressure, AI driven disruption, and fragile custody models are creating risks that remain underappreciated. This episode explains why Bitcoin’s fundamentals quietly strengthened throughout 2025 and why the coming year may reshape how Bitcoin is understood, allocated, and secured.
Morgan Stanley’s ETF Filing Signals a New Phase of Institutional Demand
Morgan Stanley filing for its own Bitcoin ETF is notable because the firm has historically avoided issuing ETFs under its core brand.
This suggests internal demand pressure has crossed a threshold where distribution economics now outweigh reputational caution.
BlackRock’s IBIT proved that Bitcoin ETFs generate durable fee revenue, client retention, and competitive advantage. Last year, IBIT became BlackRock’s largest revenue generator for the ETF business.
Institutions entering well after the first wave of ETF adoption still believe the market remains early enough to justify long term platform investment rather than opportunistic participation.
The shift underway is from offering access as a service to monetizing Bitcoin demand as a core business line.
Access Is Turning On, and Solicitation Is the Real Catalyst
Bank of America enabling Bitcoin ETF access across ~15,000 advisors marks a move from passive availability to active distribution.
Internal guidance recommending a 1–4% allocation places Bitcoin inside default portfolio construction rather than client driven conversations.
Solicitation matters because advisors scale demand only when recommendations are sanctioned and career risk is removed from the equation.
This is how new asset classes actually diffuse, first quietly through models, then broadly through rebalancing cycles.
Early flows appear modest, but the demand becomes persistent, recurring, and largely insensitive to short term price action. Gold experienced the same in the early 2000s.
Four Year Cycle Thinking Is Losing Explanatory Power
Prior drawdowns followed aggressive tightening cycles and industry wide failures, conditions that defined the post 2021 environment.
The 2026 setup is materially different, easing policy expectations, political incentives for asset stability, and expanded access.
ETFs, bank custody, and advisor solicitation fundamentally alter Bitcoin’s demand profile.
If Bitcoin sets new all time highs in 2026, it would definitively break the four year cycle framework and represent one of the most bullish structural developments in Bitcoin’s history.
Degeneracy Is a Symptom of Monetary Pressure, Not the Cause
Younger generations face sustained asset inflation, labor disruption, and declining purchasing power.
When traditional savings and wealth building paths fail, individuals are pushed toward speculation by necessity rather than preference.
Bitcoin is often misunderstood as a speculative outlet when it increasingly functions as a savings technology.
AI accelerates both productivity and displacement, widening outcome dispersion between high and low agency individuals.
Without sound money, productivity gains fail to translate into durable wealth accumulation.
Custody Risk Is Becoming the Hidden Constraint on Adoption
As Bitcoin’s value rises, both digital and physical attack vectors are increasing in frequency rather than remaining edge cases.
Another recent data breach tied to hardware and service providers reinforces that personal information leakage is an accelerating risk, not a one off event.
Physical attacks against known Bitcoin holders are being reported more frequently, highlighting the real world consequences of poor operational security.
Investors are often told they must choose between self custody with personal risk or traditional custody with institutional concentration risk.
That framing is outdated. Multi institution custody distributes trust, reduces single points of failure, and mitigates both personal and systemic risks simultaneously
🎤 Who Should We Bring On Next?
We want your input. Reply to this email with:
Who you want as a guest
Why they matter right now
One question you want us to ask them
I’ll review and respond to each submission.
— Jackson, Host of The Last Trade
P.S. Don’t want to reply? Just drop the name in the comments on the web version.
Does your Bitcoin keep you up at night?
Self-custody: Lose a device, forget a phrase, or make one wrong move, and your Bitcoin could be gone forever.
No inheritance plan: If something happens to you, how would your loved ones access what you’ve built?
Exchange exposure: Billions have been lost to hacks, outages, and custodians failing altogether.
That’s why more serious investors are moving to insured, multi-institution custody with built-in inheritance planning and seamless access to financial services.
Onramp — Where Security Meets Simplicity.