Markets continue to signal confidence while households experience rising instability. Savings no longer function as a foundation, capital markets increasingly reward financial engineering, and younger generations are forced into risk simply to maintain purchasing power.
In this episode, Jeff Deist provides a first-principles diagnosis of how monetary distortion reshaped behavior at every layer of the economy, from household balance sheets to corporate strategy.
The discussion reframes inflation, asset performance, and Bitcoin adoption not as cyclical phenomena, but as downstream consequences of a system that has quietly penalized thrift and rewarded leverage for decades.
Sound Money as the Basis for Social Cooperation
Economics, properly understood, is not about models or aggregates, but about human action, time preference, and coordination under scarcity.
Sound money anchors property rights by preserving the value of time, labor, and savings across generations.
Currency debasement destabilizes long-term planning by shifting incentives toward consumption, leverage, and political dependency.
When savings fails, individuals are forced into speculative behavior simply to preserve purchasing power.
Bitcoin and gold reintroduce monetary constraint by imposing scarcity outside political discretion.
Investor takeaway:
When money fails as a long-term reference point, social cooperation erodes and speculation becomes a survival strategy rather than a choice.
Gold’s Outperformance and the Importance of Structural Buyers
For most of the 20th century, households could preserve purchasing power through simple savings without leverage or market timing.
Prolonged interest-rate suppression inverted this dynamic, turning savings into a guaranteed real loss.
Households were pushed into equities, housing, and speculative assets as de facto savings vehicles rather than risk assets.
Volatility migrated from institutional balance sheets to household balance sheets, increasing fragility at the consumer level.
Younger generations now face higher entry prices, longer debt duration, and fewer paths to capital accumulation without outsized risk.
Investor takeaway:
The erosion of savings quietly transfers systemic risk from institutions to individuals, embedding instability directly into household balance sheets.
Financialization and the Distortion of Capital Markets
Capital markets increasingly reward balance-sheet engineering over productive output.
Equity markets now function more as liquidity venues than as mechanisms for capital allocation.
Dividend income has been replaced by price appreciation, turning ownership into speculation.
Cheap credit props up weak business models, delaying liquidation and reinforcing malinvestment.
Human capital is increasingly deployed toward financial arbitrage rather than durable value creation.
Investor takeaway:
Capital markets that reward financial engineering over production inflate asset prices while hollowing out real economic resilience.
Gold’s Breakout as a Monetary Signal
Gold’s recent performance has decoupled from traditional macro indicators like CPI, growth, and employment.
Central banks and global investors continue accumulating gold despite official claims that it is no longer money.
Rising physical demand and lease rates reflect stress within the fiat monetary system rather than optimism about growth.
Gold’s premium far exceeds its industrial or jewelry use, reinforcing its residual monetary role.
The move suggests declining confidence in fiscal and monetary discipline across major economies.
Investor takeaway:
Gold is behaving less like an inflation hedge and more like a referendum on the credibility of fiat monetary management.
Bitcoin Treasury Strategies and Financialized Adoption
Companies exist to produce goods and services, not to arbitrage monetary dysfunction.
Bitcoin treasury strategies represent financial engineering layered atop already distorted capital markets.
Investors can already access Bitcoin directly without corporate leverage, execution risk, or governance exposure.
These structures monetize monetary instability rather than addressing its root cause.
Redirecting capital and talent toward balance-sheet games reflects broader systemic misallocation.
Investor takeaway:
Bitcoin treasury strategies monetize monetary dysfunction rather than resolving it, layering leverage and execution risk onto an already distorted system.
🎤 Who Should We Bring On Next?
We want your input. Reply to this email with:
Who you want as a guest
Why they matter right now
One question you want us to ask them
I’ll review and respond to each submission.
— Jackson, Host of The Last Trade
P.S. Don’t want to reply? Just drop the name in the comments on the web version.
Does your Bitcoin keep you up at night?
Self-custody: Lose a device, forget a phrase, or make one wrong move, and your Bitcoin could be gone forever.
No inheritance plan: If something happens to you, how would your loved ones access what you’ve built?
Exchange exposure: Billions have been lost to hacks, outages, and custodians failing altogether.
That’s why more serious investors are moving to insured, multi-institution custody with built-in inheritance planning and seamless access to financial services.
Onramp — Where Security Meets Simplicity.