This week’s episode breaks down the structural forces reshaping global markets as fiscal pressures, national security priorities, and accelerating technological competition collide.
David Thayer returns to analyze why traditional valuation frameworks no longer apply in a regime defined by monetary distortion, AI investment mandates, and rising Treasury market stress.
The discussion highlights how policymakers are preparing banks, stablecoins, and new regulatory frameworks to absorb massive debt issuance while relying on hard monetary assets to manage inflation pressure.
The team also examines Bitcoin’s emerging role as a strategic reserve in the U.S.–China landscape, the rise of Wall Street structured products, and the cultural divide forming inside the industry. The message is clear. Market volatility is noise. Policy is the signal. And the monetary reset is already underway.
The New Regime: AI, National Security, and the End of Old Valuation Frameworks
Market structure now resembles a late-1990s environment, but AI introduces a national security dimension absent during the dot-com era.
Elevated valuations say more about the monetary denominator than excess speculation. Asset inflation is a structural feature of fiscal dominance.
The Administration’s AI “Genesis Mission” reflects an existential race with China, where currency stability is secondary to technological primacy.
Government support creates a durable floor under AI, energy, and chip fabrication spending regardless of near-term profitability.
The liquidity required for AI and energy infrastructure reinforces long-term monetary debasement, making Bitcoin the natural release valve.
Treasury Market Stress and the Policy Response Now Taking Shape
The United States must roll over tens of trillions in maturing debt during a period of declining foreign demand, forcing policymakers to engineer domestic buyers.
Revisions to the supplementary leverage ratio push banks back into the role of systemic Treasury absorbers.
Stablecoins have become a strategic tool, with new regulation positioning them as steady purchasers of U.S. debt.
Potential leadership changes at the Federal Reserve, including Kevin Hassett as a front-runner, suggest a more Bitcoin-literate policy posture.
Washington’s strategy blends engineered demand for Treasuries with reliance on hard monetary assets to absorb inflation pressure.
Bitcoin as Strategic Reserve: Gold Positioning, State Adoption, and the U.S. – China Dynamic
China likely understates its true gold reserves, while doubts persist about U.S. holdings, creating asymmetric strategic incentives.
Texas completed its first Treasury-backed Bitcoin allocation at an ~87k cost basis, setting a precedent for state-level adoption.
Bitcoin aligns with American principles and incentives. The United States holds more aggregate Bitcoin wealth and business infrastructure than any other country.
Gold remains the neutral settlement layer for global trade, but Bitcoin provides asymmetric upside for early adopters and strategic advantage for the U.S.
Policymakers increasingly understand the dual structure. Gold preserves. Bitcoin advances. Both matter.
Wall Street’s Formal Entry: Structured Products, Yield Illusions, and Institutional Positioning
JPMorgan launched its first structured Bitcoin product using iBit, revealing institutional conviction about the asset’s trajectory.
Investors earn a 16 percent return if Bitcoin trades higher within the next year, otherwise extending to 2028 with a 1.5x payout.
The bank earns the most if Bitcoin meaningfully exceeds 1.5x by 2028, signaling internal expectations of significant upside.
Structured products target clients who want exposure without volatility while allowing large banks to monetize Bitcoin’s asymmetric curve.
Wall Street is no longer denying Bitcoin. It intends to capture its upside.
Culture War in Bitcoin: Self-Custody, Treasury Companies, and Political Perception
Bitcoin is becoming politicized by association rather than design, risking unnecessary voter polarization.
The community is split between self-custody purists and new institutional entrants focused on structured exposure and yield strategies.
Treasury companies face index-eligibility risks, including potential MSCI rulings that could reduce passive flow access.
Long-term adoption is driven by liquidity depth. Number-go-up is what attracts large capital pools and stabilizes the market.
The industry must emphasize Bitcoin’s role in freedom, human rights, and monetary reliability to avoid corrosive political narratives.
🎤 Who Should We Bring On Next?
We want your input. Reply to this email with:
Who you want as a guest
Why they matter right now
One question you want us to ask them
I’ll review and respond to each submission.
— Jackson, Host of The Last Trade
P.S. Don’t want to reply? Just drop the name in the comments on the web version.
Does your Bitcoin keep you up at night?
Self-custody: Lose a device, forget a phrase, or make one wrong move, and your Bitcoin could be gone forever.
No inheritance plan: If something happens to you, how would your loved ones access what you’ve built?
Exchange exposure: Billions have been lost to hacks, outages, and custodians failing altogether.
That’s why more serious investors are moving to insured, multi-institution custody with built-in inheritance planning and seamless access to financial services.
Onramp — Where Security Meets Simplicity.