This episode argues that the Bitcoin supercycle is unfolding as a repricing of money rather than a speculative breakout. Marty Bent frames 2025 as a year of consolidation marked by muted retail participation, selling pressure from long-time holders, and a broader reset in positioning—conditions that have set the stage for 2026. Gold and silver are absorbing the first wave of sovereign and institutional capital, signaling stress in the global debt system before Bitcoin is fully repriced as a digital reserve asset.

The conversation ties rising political dysfunction, visible monetary debasement, and accelerating AI-driven productivity into a single conclusion: capital is moving toward assets that cannot be faked. In that environment, Bitcoin stops behaving like a cycle-driven trade and starts behaving like the end state.

Bitcoin’s Price Action and the End of 2025 Consolidation

  • 2025 served as a consolidation phase that absorbed long-term holder selling without triggering broad capitulation.

  • Price stability persisted despite muted retail participation, signaling demand resilience rather than exhaustion.

  • ETF flows introduced steady, balance-sheet driven demand that dampened volatility and anchored price.

  • Bitcoin increasingly traded alongside gold and silver, reflecting a shift toward monetary rather than risk-asset framing.

  • Early-2026 strength reflects the exhaustion of sellers rather than the arrival of speculative buyers.

Gold, Silver, and the Sovereign Order of Operations

  • Gold and silver continue to attract sovereign and institutional buyers seeking assets outside the fiat credit system.

  • Demand is driven by balance-sheet protection rather than inflation hedging or growth expectations.

  • Physical market dynamics increasingly diverge from paper pricing, signaling stress in monetary settlement layers.

  • Precious metals benefit from familiarity, liquidity depth, and historical precedent during regime transitions.

  • This phase reflects an order of operations where conservative capital moves first.

Currency Debasement and the Breakdown of Monetary Credibility

  • Persistent currency debasement undermines long-term planning for households, institutions, and governments.

  • Conflicts between fiscal authorities and central banks expose fractures in monetary governance.

  • Rising debt burdens force policymakers toward inflationary resolution rather than discipline.

  • Public trust erodes as monetary policy increasingly serves political objectives.

  • Capital responds by seeking neutrality rather than yield.

Stablecoins, Control, and the Illusion of Monetary Progress

  • Stablecoins remain permissioned instruments, with issuers retaining the ability to freeze or revoke funds.

  • Reserve backing ties stablecoin systems directly to sovereign debt and the traditional banking stack.

  • Recent freezes and enforcement actions highlight their equivalence to legacy financial rails.

  • Convenience obscures the persistence of counterparty and censorship risk.

  • Stablecoins optimize payment rails without solving the core problem of monetary sovereignty.

Artificial Intelligence, Productivity, and Monetary Fragility

  • AI-driven productivity gains increase output while reducing labor’s bargaining power.

  • Displacement risk is rising faster than wage growth or institutional adjustment.

  • Deflationary technology collides with currencies designed to lose purchasing power.

  • Savings denominated in debasing units fail to preserve economic time across transitions.

  • Assets that cannot be faked or diluted become essential reference points.

🎤 Who Should We Bring On Next?

We want your input. Reply to this email with:

  • Who you want as a guest

  • Why they matter right now

  • One question you want us to ask them

I’ll review and respond to each submission.

— Jackson, Host of The Last Trade

P.S. Don’t want to reply? Just drop the name in the comments on the web version.

Does your Bitcoin keep you up at night?

Self-custody: Lose a device, forget a phrase, or make one wrong move, and your Bitcoin could be gone forever.

No inheritance plan: If something happens to you, how would your loved ones access what you’ve built?

Exchange exposure: Billions have been lost to hacks, outages, and custodians failing altogether.

That’s why more serious investors are moving to insured, multi-institution custody with built-in inheritance planning and seamless access to financial services.

Onramp — Where Security Meets Simplicity.

Listen to the full episode here:

Know someone who’d enjoy this? Forward this email to help us grow The Last Trade.

Follow Onramp’s X and LinkedIn to stay up to date with our research, analysis, and content.

RATE THIS WEEK'S EDITION

We welcome your feedback - let us know what you think.

Login or Subscribe to participate

Keep Reading